Mayhill Fowler says she didn't hide that she was recording ex-President
Clinton's angry words ("sleazy" . . . "slimy" . . . "dishonest" . . .
"scumbag") about a Vanity Fair
reporter, while he greeted voters in public as he campaigned for his
wife in June 2008. BUT Clinton obviously did not know Fowler was a
HuffPost "citizen journalist." Should she have ID'd herself? (She clearly got a more honest take from Clinton than if he'd known she was a journalist.)
Shouldn't
public figures know nowadays that anything said in public -- especially
rants (or racism) -- will be recorded and available forever? Exhibits A (and A1) and B.
Mayhill Fowler's earlier reporting scoop that launched "Bittergate" uproar. The Bittergate of 2012 campaign: "47%-gate."
No comments:
Post a Comment